R
' COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No: WR4502-14
20 Novemoer 2014
Dear Gunnery Sergeant —_
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
RB three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 November 9014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with aaministrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material } J
support thereort, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 26 August
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
snsufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
yotes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
reguest.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9925 14
JSR Docket No: NR9925-14 fu November
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6828 14
A three-member: panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR6828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3429 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3429-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8269 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7074 13
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to che proceedings of this Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7008 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO7008-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6707 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3348 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and revcedures applicable to the proceedings oF 8» Board. New evidence is evidence the Board prior to making its decision ep in mind that you are entitl reconsider its year from the date of the Bo not previously considered by in this case. rrection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5588 14
Additionally, the Board considered your response dated 20 Nov 2014. , However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7250 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered’ your application on 20 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR7250-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of 7 probable material error or injustice.